Synopse

To content | To menu | To search

Tag - security

Entries feed

2012, Monday May 28

Synopse mORMot Framework 1.16

Our Open Source mORMot framework is now available in revision 1.16.

The main new features are the following:

Thanks to its features, mORMot is now able to provide a stand-alone Domain-Driven Design framework for Delphi.

Quite a long and nice road for a little mORMot, and more to come!

Continue reading...

2012, Friday April 20

WCF, mORMot and Event Sourcing

Our latest mORMot feature is interface-based service implementation.

How does it compare with the reference of SOA implementation (at least in the Windows world) - aka WCF?

"Comparaison n'est pas raison", as we use to say in France.
But we will also speak about Event Sourcing, and why it is now on our official road map.
Comparing our implementation with WCF is the opportunity to make our framework always better.

Continue reading...

2012, Wednesday March 28

Return custom content from an interface-based service

As stated by this previous article, the default answer format is a valid JSON object.

In some cases, it may be useful to have a service operation (i.e. an interface method) returning any content, e.g. some plain TEXT, HTML or binary data (like a picture).

Continue reading...

2012, Wednesday March 7

Interface based services - sample code

In addition to the other related blog articles, you can find in the "SQLite3/Samples/14 - Interface based services" folder of the supplied source code distribution, a dedicated sample about this feature.

Purpose of this code is to show how to create a client-server service, using interfaces, over named pipe communication.

Continue reading...

Interface based services - Implementation details

You will find out in SQLite3Commons.pas all classes implementing this interface communication.

There are two levels of implementation:
- A services catalog, available in TSQLRest.Services property, declared as TServiceContainer (with two inherited versions, for each side);
- A service factory for each interface, declared as TServiceFactory (also with two inherited versions, for each side).

In fact, TServiceFactory.Create constructor will retrieve all needed RTTI information of the given interface, i.e. GUID, name and all methods (with their arguments). It will compute the low-level stack memory layout needed at execution. And the corresponding "contract" will be computed, to validate that both client and server expect the exact same interface.

On the server side, TServiceFactoryServer.ExecuteMethod method (and then a nested TServiceMethod.InternalExecute call) is used to prepare a valid call to the implementation class code from a remote JSON request.

On the client side, a TInterfacedObjectFake class will be created, and will emulate a regular Delphi interface call using some on-the-fly asm code generated in the TServiceFactoryClient.Create constructor.

Continue reading...

Interface based services - Using services on the Client or Server sides

Once the service is registered on the server side, it is very easy to use it in your code.

In a complex Service Oriented Architecture, it is pretty common to have services calling each other. Code re-usability is a key here. So you'll have to consume services on the server side. According to the SOLID design principles, you'd better rely on abstraction in your code, i.e. not call the service implementation, but the service abstract interface.

You can use the following method of your TSQLRest.Services instance (note that this method is available on both client and server sides, so is the right access point to all services):

 function TServiceFactory.Get(out Obj): Boolean;

Continue reading...

Interface based services - Server side

In order to have an operating service, you'll need to implement a Delphi class which matches the expected interface.

Continue reading...

Interface based services - defining a data contract

In a Service Oriented Architecture, services tend to create a huge list of operations.
In order to facilitate implementation and maintenance, operations shall be grouped within common services.

The data contract is to be defined as a plain Delphi interface type.
In fact, the sample type as stated in a previous blog article can be used directly:

type
  ICalculator = interface(IInvokable)
    ['{9A60C8ED-CEB2-4E09-87D4-4A16F496E5FE}']
    /// add two signed 32 bit integers
    function Add(n1,n2: integer): integer;
  end;

This ICalculator.Add method will define one "Add" operation, under the "ICalculator" service (which will be named internally 'Calculator' by convention).
This operation will expect two numbers as input, and then return the sum of those numbers.

Continue reading...

Interface based services

The Client-Server services via methods implementation (our DataSnap-like feature) gives full access to the lowest-level of the mORMot's core, so it has some advantages:
- It can be tuned to fit any purpose (such as retrieving or returning some HTML or binary data, or modifying the HTTP headers on the fly);
- It is integrated into the RESTful URI model, so it can be related to any table/class of our ORM framework (like DataAsHex service above), or it can handle any remote query (e.g. any AJAX or SOAP requests);
- It has a very low performance overhead, so can be used to reduce server workload for some common tasks.

But this implementation pattern has some drawbacks:
- Most content marshaling is to be done by hand, so may introduce implementation issues;
- Client and server side code does not have the same implementation pattern, so you will have to code explicitly data marshaling twice, for both client and server;
- The services do not have any hierarchy, and are listed as a plain list, which is not very convenient;
- It is difficult to synchronize several service calls within a single context, e.g. when a workflow is to be handled during the application process (you have to code some kind of state machine on both sides);
- Security is handled globally for the user, or should be checked by hand in the implementation method (using the aParams.Context values).

You can get rid of those limitations with the interface-based service implementation of mORMot. For a detailed introduction and best practice guide to SOA, you can consult this "classic" article.

According to this document, all expected SOA features are now available in the current implementation of the mORMot framework (including service catalog aka "broker").

Continue reading...

2012, Monday February 6

Modification of TSQLRestServerCallBack method prototype (bis)

In order to implement some RESTful Services, a callback has to be defined on the server side.

The prototype of these methods has been modified one more time, to supply an unique parameter:
This is a CODE BREAK change and you shall refresh ALL your server-side code to match the new signature.

This unique parameter will let the signature remain untouched in your code implementation, even if the framework evolves (like adding a new parameter).

Continue reading...

2011, Friday December 30

Hash collision attack

A variety of programming languages suffer from a denial-of-service (DoS) condition against storage functions of key/value pairs in hash data structures, the condition can be leveraged by exploiting predictable collisions in the underlying hashing algorithms.

The issue finds particular exposure in web server applications and/or frameworks. In particular, the lack of sufficient limits for the number of parameters in POST requests in conjunction with the predictable collision properties in the hashing functions of the underlying languages can render web applications vulnerable to the DoS condition. The attacker, using specially crafted HTTP requests, can lead to a 100% of CPU usage which can last up to several hours depending on the targeted application and server performance, the amplification effect is considerable and requires little bandwidth and time on the attacker side.

Source: #2011-003 multiple implementations denial-of-service via hash algorithm collision

Continue reading...

2011, Wednesday November 30

AJAX authentication

A nice framework user, named esmondb, did write and publish some JavaScript code to handle our RESTful authentication mechanism.

It seems to work well, and implements all secure hashing and challenging.
Our authentication mechanism is much more advanced than the one used by DataSnap - which is a basic HTTP authentication with the password transmitted in clear (this is the reason why it shall better be used over HTTPS, whereas mORMot can be used over plain HTTP).
Resulting JavaScript code seems not difficult to follow, even for a no JS expert like me.

Continue reading...

2011, Tuesday May 24

How to implement RESTful authentication

How to handle authentication in a RESTful Client-Server architecture is a matter of debate.

Commonly, it can be achieved, in the SOA over HTTP world via:
- HTTP basic auth over HTTPS;
- Cookies and session management;
- Query Authentication with additional signature parameters.

We'll have to adapt, or even better mix those techniques, to match our framework architecture at best.

Each authentication scheme has its own PROs and CONs, depending on the purpose of your security policy and software architecture.

Continue reading...

2010, Sunday July 4

Named Pipe, Vista, Seven and Service

If you want some local communicate between a service software and a front-end GUI application, named pipes are a viable mechanism for this communication. It worked fine until Windows XP, then came Vista, Seven, and the UAC...

Continue reading...

page 2 of 2 -